Governments, appointed and elected leaders are chipping away at the secured unalienable rights guaranteed by the US Constitution by introducing laws that don’t stand a lawful litmus test. Photo courtesy Quia.
Is the US Government preparing to forcefully Quarantine unvaccinated citizens?
It is the responsibility of every U.S. citizen to question their government’s rationales for laws, executive orders or regulations which, when enacted, would infringe on God-given rights and liberties within the U.S. Declaration of Independence and Constitution including The Bill of Rights. We need to know our Constitutional responsibilities and associated liberties.
The Bill of Rights is the first 10 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. It spells out guaranteed civil rights and liberties to the individual in relation to their government. It sets rules for due legal process and reserves all powers not delegated to the Federal Government to the people or the States. It specifies “the enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage the others retained by the people.”
Fourth Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses [residences], papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
During 2021, there has been discourse about the undermining or reallocation of the personal autonomy the U.S. founding documents state are God-given; not the purview of human governments. Governments are to protect and defend these, not confiscate or destroy them. Many brave men and women died defending them on our behalf.
Physical restrictions and requirements due to Covid19; parents acting properly responsible regarding the content of school curricula and safety of children at schools; and the lack of staples via disruption of the supply chain(s); all converge to undermine the economy while increasing fear and anxiety among the US population sets up a similar scenario to the take-over of Germany by Nazis and Russia by Communists. Combining health/safety fears with targeted deprivation is a formula to have residents become willing to incrementally enslave themselves for a promise of relief.
Marxists-Communists/Elitist-Eugenicists detest our founding documents and the freedom of thought, and liberties of speech and personal governance of one’s self and children in basic life choices: e.g., what goes into our bodies, what goes into our children’s minds and the ability to choose where we live and work. They prefer a dictatorship of perpetual martial law control rather than governing.
For several months there has been media discussion of U.S. internment camps/centers for those not receiving COVID19 shots and/or those labeled “domestic terrorists”.
Aussies Forcefully Quarantine Citizens, Are Americans Next?
On November 23, 2021, Australia announced it forcibly quarantined a small group of citizens. Hopefully, this alerts U.S. citizens of how essential it is to have stable, published parameters for states of emergencies, martial law and our God-given rights which fear does not revoke.
The following is a brief overview of some definitions and descriptions regarding diverse types of camps and suspension of rights authorizations.
Officially, CDC/FEMA “Shielding Camps” are described as being to separate persons within the U.S. not deemed contagious from those who are; whereas “Isolation and Quarantine” facilities are to help protect the U.S. public by preventing their exposure to people entering the U.S. from foreign countries who may have a contagious disease. Isolation is supposed to separate sick people with a contagious disease from the healthy.
Quarantine separates and restricts the movement of people exposed to a contagious disease to see if they become sick to keep from spreading the disease(s) in question. This requires identification and processing of immigrants rather than having an open border. The CDC/FEMA Shielding Camps Guidelines use the term ‘green zone’ defined as, “High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting. They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.”
The first quarantine station and hospital built in the U.S. was in 1799, port of Philadelphia after a yellow fever outbreak in 1793. The National Quarantine Act was passed in 1878, shifting quarantine powers from state to federal government. The Public Health Service Act formed the federal government’s quarantine authority in 1944. CDC (as the National Communicable Disease Center) took over federal quarantine functions in 1967.
In 1970, CDC reduced quarantine stations from 55 to 8 because infectious diseases were thought conquered. During 2004–2007, quarantine stations increased to 20 due to bioterrorism concerns after the 9/11/01 World Trade Center attack and worldwide SARS outbreak in 2003.
There are a number of pieces of legislation giving away our birthright of holding the government accountable to us to ensure our liberties are not held hostage to fear-mongering promising quick relief. The Patriot Act, CDC charter, Homeland Security (FEMA), Justice Department (FBI), DOD (Federalized troops), The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and the president triggering the Insurrection Act – all contain legal mechanisms to temporarily, delay due process, and remove U.S. citizens’ liberties.
The Department of Defense document ‘INTERNMENT AND RESETTLEMENT OPERATIONS; document FM 3-39.40, for implementing the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)’ President Obama sighed on December 31, 2011, codifies indefinite military detention without charge or trial into law for the first time in U.S. history (For more about the NDAA, visit www.aclu.org/NDAA).
“NDAA…codifies indefinite military detention without charge or trial into law for the first time in U.S. history…”
Document FM 3-39-40 outlines the military procedures for internment and resettlement of U.S. civilians. It describes the layout and administration of punitive internment camps. Page 2-8 (38) gives the civilian support areas applicable within U.S. territory: the consequences of natural or man-made disasters, accidents, terrorist attacks and incidents in the U.S. and its territories. Page 7-4 (147) specifically addresses detainment of U.S. citizens by the identification procedures for new prisoners which states social security numbers are to be recorded beside the new prisoners’ photograph and fingerprints. The organizations which may be involved in these internment operations are: the Department of Homeland Security, the FEMA, the Department of Defense and the United Nations.
How this would be carried out has been discussed within the military; particularly the feasibility or lack thereof of tasking local National Guard personnel with incarcerating their family and neighbors.
“”Build Back Better”, One World Government in which U.S. founding documents would no longer be treated as valid…”
In May 2016, President Obama approved the U.N.’s Kigali Principles, allowing UN peacekeeping troops to use force to “protect” all non-military citizens as a potential global police force. The Kigali Principles are illegal for implementation in the USA according to the US Constitution, yet the Obama administration signed them.
The “Kigali Principles on the Protection of Civilians” are a non-binding set of pledges to implement certain UN-based ‘best practices in peacekeeping’ issued at the conclusion of the High-Level International Conference on the Protection of Civilians held in Rwanda May, 2015. These are part of the Global Reset, “Build Back Better”, One World Government in which U.S. founding documents would no longer be treated as valid.
The Kigali Principles are not to be confused with the Kigali Amendment for phasing down hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) which President Biden directed his administration to prepare to send to the Senate for U.S. ratification.
The October 4, 2021 official memo and press release of Attorney General Merrick Garland suggesting parents could be classified as domestic terrorists which could possibly have the U.S. Department of Defense Law of War ensue. Department of Defense Directive 2311.01, Publication July 2, 2020 page 16 states its war crime definition:
Serious violations of the law of war that generally have been committed intentionally, such as murder, torture, rape, pillage, extensive and wanton destruction of property without justification, and intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population or civilians protected as such. “War crimes” may be defined differently in other contexts for other legal purposes. This definition is intentionally fluid; sets it up to be used the same way martial law was by German Chancellor Hitler resulting in his murderous dictatorship.
Criminal code 18 U.S.C. § 2331(5), includes definitions of Domestic Terrorism, Violent Extremism and Hate Crimes. A Domestic Terrorist “DT incident” is a criminal act, including threats or acts of violence made to specific victims, in furtherance of a domestic socio-political goal, which has occurred and can be confirmed. A “DT plot” is a combination of criminal activity and planning that collectively reflect steps toward criminal action in furtherance of a domestic political or social goal. Hate crimes and DT incidents are often not mutually exclusive. A hate crime is targeted violence motivated by the offender’s bias against a person’s actual or perceived characteristics, while a DT incident is a criminal act, including threats or acts of violence made to specific victims, made in furtherance of a domestic socio-political goal.
It is wise to contact our current U.S. Senators, Representatives, and local officials to discover if and how they are monitoring the erosion of our founding documented liberties. Find their positions on use of U.S. military to detain citizens who do not want to receive experimental gene therapy injections, and/or who want to be respectfully received when giving input into public schools regarding appropriate curricula content, extra curricula-activities and basic personal safety for their children attending tax-supported public schools.
Barbara Bush, M.P.S. was an alcoholic/drug addict until age 34, and after a 5 year cleansing period she earned a master’s degree from Loyola University Graduate Institute for Ministry. Her career has spanned federal, state and local governments, community organizations and ministry working in behavioral health, criminal justice and human services. For the past ten years she has focused on promoting Biblical Truth. She is the principal at Graceful Dynamics Consulting.
Please “like”, comment, share with a friend, and donate to support The Standard on this page. Become a Patron!
Click the QR Code below to donate any amount.