We’ve all heard the term “conspiracy theorist” used against those who question government explanations of various events that occur over time. The term originated with one of the government ABC organizations, reportedly the CIA in 1967. This was to discredit anyone who questioned the declaration by the Warren Commission concerning Lee Harvey Oswald being a “lone gunman” following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963. If they did question they were labeled a conspiracy theorist with a pointed tin hat.
Well, the tables are now turned on the FBI and other ABC government agencies concerning conspiracies to defraud the American people and our right to free and fair elections without governmental interference! The FBI and other agencies have said that there was no interference in the election of Joseph Biden and that anybody who thought so was a–conspiracy theorist.
Thanks must go to Elon Musk for unraveling hidden communications and outing of nefarious creatures lurking within Twitter and his releasing persons and dates of their censure, the covered and hidden Tweets, secret communications between Twitter and government agents and agencies, payoffs made to twitter to shift public opinion toward Biden and away from Trump. The perpetrators have been exposed and caught with their fingers in the proverbial cookie jar. Twitter’s new transparency policy has gone a long way toward exposing federal government involvement in corruption, fraud, and election interference. The FBI appears to be leading the way at present, but more agencies may be exposed.
Musk revealed that the FBI paid over $3.4 million to Twitter to help fix the 2020 election in favor of Joe Biden! The truth may be worse than many people even thought was possible. In fact, it appears there really was a plot against President Trump.
The latest release of the Twitter Files reveals how the FBI conspired with Twitter to scrub and censor the Hunter Biden laptop story first reported by the NY Post. This one event helped cleanse and censor communications thus allowing operatives to “fix” the election against President Trump.
This was possible because many “former” FBI agents came to work for Twitter. Not only work there but were placed in sensitive positions to help throw their weight in the 2020 election by suppressing and censoring public speech and information in a public speech platform. The FBI was thus able to organize a “tabletop exercise” in September of 2020 where they walked through various scenarios in case of an emergency. In this case the emergency was Hunter’s laptop suppression, and how to prevent reelection of Trump.
Twitter Trust and Safety chief Yoel Roth also gamed how they would respond to the Russians running a leak operation against Hunter Biden as an “October Surprise.” The real October surprise turned out to be fraud by the FBI in overthrowing an US election in favor of their Manchurian candidate.
In December 14, 2020, The Wall Street Journal reported:
Attorney General William Barr, in the weeks before November’s election, instructed prosecutors and senior colleagues to prevent word of investigations into Hunter Biden from becoming public and keep the Justice Department out of campaign politics, according to people familiar with the matter.
Mr. Barr took more steps than previously reported to insulate the investigations, despite calls from President Trump and Republican allies to announce a probe involving President-elect Joe Biden’s son Hunter.
The DailyMail.com reported December 14, 2020:
In October [2020], Republican lawmakers demanded a criminal probe of Hunter Biden, but the DOJ did not respond. Senate Republicans had conducted their own investigation, which they released shortly before the election…
At that time [October 2020] President Trump made much noise about Attorney General William Barr on Twitter since news of the Hunter Biden probe broke.
Information was circulating prior to the election in 2020 about Hunter Biden’s business dealings with Communist China energy officials with CEFC. These dealings were reported by the NY Post to be on Hunter Biden’s laptop computer. That laptop computer was provided to the Post by Rudy Giuliani prior to the election.
Political parties and operatives providing embarrassing information about political opponents or their family’s is nothing new, it’s been done since time began. In fact, embarrassing, and legal, information was dropped on Charles D. “Pug” Ravenel that disqualified him just prior to the SC gubernatorial election back in the 1970’s,. That led to the election of Dr. James B. Edwards as the first Republican since reconstruction in SC.
Trump linked his complaints about Barr to his effort to overturn the election. In another strange turn of events in the 2016 election FBI Director James Comey informed lawmakers that the bureau was “investigating new emails uncovered on former Rep. Anthony Weiner’s laptop. The disclosure provided another blow to the Clinton camp, and Hillary Clinton and other aides have cited Comey as helping cause her defeat.”
Trump blasted Barr on Twitter in 2020, Tweeting, “IF Biden gets in, nothing will happen to Hunter or Joe. Barr will do nothing, and the new group of partisan killers coming in will quickly kill it all. Same thing with Durham. We caught them cold, spying, treason & more (the hard part), but “Justice” took too long.”
Part of the revelation that was that Hunter Biden failed to disclose $400,000 in payments from the Ukrainian energy company Burisma. Just this past week America First Legal (AFL) filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking documents that reference “Burisma” from the Obama-era. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is prepared to comply with the request of almost 300 emails. The potential for a holdup is in the White House invoking executive privilege to stop their release.
AFL president Stephen Miller filed suit in federal court to obtain the Hunter Biden emails. Miller was interviewed on Fox News where he said AFL is filing suit to “fight public corruption of the highest order. Influence peddling for cash threatens our national security, allows foreign adversaries to extort our leaders, and undermines all public faith and confidence in government. And, in many cases, it is criminal.”
30. Efforts continued to influence Twitter's Yoel Roth.
In Sept 2020, Roth participated in an Aspen Institute “tabletop exercise” on a potential "Hack-and-Dump" operation relating to Hunter Biden
The goal was to shape how the media covered it — and how social media carried it pic.twitter.com/lQSorONUSh
— Michael Shellenberger (@ShellenbergerMD) December 19, 2022
Heads should roll! But, this is unlikely considering whom we are dealing with in Joe Biden. If ever there was reason for contempt of a government official it is now and this brings it to a frothy top. Is anybody ever to be able to trust any of these organizations again? It is not the role of government to lie, cheat or steal, but it appears that they have done all to the benefit of their chosen candidate.
This reminds me of the JFK assassination. All fingers pointed toward the CIA involvement, but they continually denied involvement until the past few years when they admitted such involvement. Again, is anybody ever able to trust any of these organizations again?
The New York Post published the Hunter Biden laptop expose and all about the contents of said computer. It now has come to light that the FBI was in a conspiracy with former Twitter executives to conspire against President Trump and his reelection bid in violation of the law. Roth later admitted he was “primed” to believe it was a Russian disinformation campaign, which led to Twitter censoring the story.
The truth of this story sounds more like a Hollywood movie drama but in reality it is the revelation of corrupt bureaucratic government agencies. The latest Twitter Files show how Twitter General Counsel James Baker–– who previously served as FBI General Counsel during the Russian collusion hoax––pushed a baseless claim that the Post’s reporting violated the platform’s hacked materials policy.
39. At 3:38 pm that same day, October 14, Baker arranges a phone conversation with Matthew J. Perry in the Office of the General Counsel of the FBI pic.twitter.com/26ub4A4uKd
— Michael Shellenberger (@ShellenbergerMD) December 19, 2022
Twitter has revealed that FBI and Big Tech clearly engaged in a “plot against the President” during the 2020 election to boost Joe Biden by trying to discredit President Trump with negative stories about his candidacy. This also proves that a government agency has been actively suppressing free speech in violation of the US Constitution, and the FBI was involved in a payoff bribe to Twitter of $3.4 million to quash the Hunter Biden story while concealing truth and censoring free speech.
46. The FBI’s influence campaign may have been helped by the fact that it was paying Twitter millions of dollars for its staff time.
“I am happy to report we have collected $3,415,323 since October 2019!” reports an associate of Jim Baker in early 2021. pic.twitter.com/SmNse97QxK
— Michael Shellenberger (@ShellenbergerMD) December 19, 2022
Normally, one should expect that these actions would prompt Congress to investigate the FBI, call forward Twitter executives, hold hearings to determine what has happened and demand resignations and criminal trials. One should also expect private lawsuits against the FBI for election interference and violation of 1st Amendment guarantees. We will see how these facts proceed under today’s ruling regime.
Michael Reed is Publisher of The Standard newspaper, print and online. TheStandardSC video media channel is being censored by dominant social media groups like YouTube. YouTube, owed by Alphabet (Google), removed and destroyed all of our video work without permission or remuneration. That has stopped all potential donations from our many supporters on that venue. If you want to continue to see independent thought and reports please “like”, comment, share with a friend, and donate to support The Standard on this page to assure the continued availability of news that is ignored too often by the dominant media.