The WHO Coup? Judas Goat Part 4

Is the entire world league of nations involved in a United Nations pandemic coup? Image courtesy of Frontline Genomics  

 

“Yet this you have, that you hate the works of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate”. — Revelation 2:6

“So you also have those who adhere to the teaching of the Nicolaitans, which I hate”. — Revelation 2:15

 

See previous articles in the Judas Goat series: Part 1, part 2, part 3.

The word “Nicolaitans” comes from the Greek compound word “Nikolaites”; concordance numbers 3531, 3532 and 3534; and means destruction of people or conquer over people. This word “conquer” means to use force and control over someone(s). The Nicolaitans in the early church were a theological system run by a hierarchy of elites who forced its people (members) to submit to their dominion (rulership). They told you what you need to believe, what instructions to follow and not to follow.

 

1948, the United Nations (UN) founded the World Health Organization (WHO) to promote health, safety and serve vulnerable populations globally to have optimum health for all as the outcome according to its published self-description. From its start, it connected non-government agencies, commercial entities and a variety of other stakeholders, usually with vested interests, to work with government agencies to achieve its stakeholder’s goals. There is an informative back story to their history.

A brief history of the WHO. Sir Julian Huxley (1887-1975), biologist, and social reformer, and devout life-long member of the British Eugenics Society, a leader of the post-WW2 eugenics movement founded the influential United Nations Education, Science and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in 1946; was its Director General 1946-1948 and founded the World Wildlife Fund in 1961 to link environmental causes as a subtle support for eugenics. Huxley worked closely with London’s Tavistock Psychiatric Clinic, led by psychiatrist Brigadier General John Rawlings Rees, which received funds from the Rockefeller and Macy Foundations,1930s-1950s. The Tavistock Clinic innovated psychiatric techniques to influence group behavior using mixtures of Pavlovian behaviorism and Freudian theories. A psychiatrist who worked with Rees there was Canadian, G. Brock Chisolm, who, in 1948, founded the UN’s World Health Organization (WHO) to promote mental and physical health worldwide. Sadly, Chisholm’s personal belief was that a lack of health sprang from society’s beliefs in: right and wrong, individualism, family and national loyalties, and religious beliefs. His remedy for this was a global government which would replace these elements. Today, there is a cross pollination of similar ideas and funders throughout the UN, It’s WHO and the World Economic Forum (WEF) through the WEF’s Young Global Leadership Training Program which has graduated over 800 persons, many of who serve in government, industries with major government contracts, funder/investors and nongovernment organizations including civil society organizations which are interwoven through multiple financial and personnel ties. Another common tie among the persons and organizations is their belief in elitism, a self-selected few should rule the masses in an oligarchical dictatorship. Communism/socialism is a means to an end; not an end in itself.

Some UN agencies are described as autonomous within the UN and the WHO as one. The WHO is headquartered in Geneva, has 6 regional offices and its own internal governance structure. The World Health Assembly (WHA) is the WHO’s governing body. Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus was appointed Director General of the WHO during 2017.

 

The WHO declared it needed to improve global pandemic responses based on the past two and a half years of COVID19. They chose to make changes to their International Health Regulations (IHR) and to generate a Pandemic Treaty which would be the second such document in the WHO’s history.  

 

 

US Government Input to WHO Regarding Revisions to Existing Regulations and a New Treaty November 6, 2021, U.S. National Institutes of Health published: A pandemic treaty, revised international health regulations, or both?’ discussing the pros and cons of these approaches. This document reported at that time, some countries expressed reservations regarding a pandemic treaty; China, USA, Brazil, and Russia among others. It also stated pharmaceutical companies would be reluctant to have their patent-profit relationships altered by international treaty mandates. To overcome corporate obstacles, it stated pharmaceutical companies and other key stakeholders could be invited to participate in the negotiations.

January 20, 2022, the Permanent Mission of the U.S. in Geneva sent the WHA, a formal letter with suggestions for changes to the International Health Regulations (IHR) which referenced genetic manipulation and other COVID19 pandemic specific items. It suggested changes for mandatory communications and/or reporting among other UN related agencies: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) and other relevant entities.

The WHA determines the policies of the WHO and deals with budgetary, administrative, and similar issues. The WHA met to consider the change suggestions from the U.S. and others to the IHR. In addition to revising IHR, they decided to write a binding signatory treaty for all 194 U.N. countries. Currently, pre-treaty, when a regulation is adopted by the assembly, it applies to all WHO member countries including those which voted against it, except those governments which specifically notify WHO they reject the regulation or accept it only with certain reservations.

 

The Developing Pandemic Treaty

The WHO is in the process of putting forth a Pandemic Treaty which, if passed, will be binding to all 194 member nations. The current somewhat flexible timeline is: On 1 December 2021, the 194 members of the WHO reached consensus to begin the process to draft and negotiate an international instrument (Pandemic Treaty) under the Constitution of the WHO with its published purpose in a document titled, Strategic Preparedness, Readiness and Response Plan being to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.

 

This publication’s cover has raised clenched fists which is the Communist salute. An intergovernmental negotiating body (INB) was constituted and had an initial meeting February 24, 2022, next, held its first declared public meeting which included registered, interested stakeholders including big pharma, April 12-13, 2022, and is to hold the second public meeting, June 16-17. 2022. It will then deliver a progress report to the 76th World Health Assembly not later than 2023, with the aim to adopt the instrument by its 77th World Health Assembly in 2024.

 

What Are The Stated Goals of the Pandemic Treaty?

The WHO’s Director-General, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, opened the February 24, 2022, initial meeting of the INB to draft and negotiate a WHO Pandemic Treaty stating COVID19 revealed the following weaknesses in existing strategies and resources at national and global levels: Complex, fragmented governance and lack of leadership; Inadequate financing; insufficient systems and tools; inequity of resources deployment; and lack of trust within and among all affected countries, organizations and the general public. He stated:                            

Voluntary mechanisms have not solved and will not solve these challenges…. We need to take the lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and use them to build back better.”

 

Ghebreyesus declared the need for at least five actions:

1. Build national, regional and global capacities for preparing and responding to pandemics ;and other global health emergencies, based on a whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach;
2. Establish global access and benefit for sharing for all pathogens, and define a global policy for the equitable production and distribution of countermeasures;
3. Establish robust systems and tools for pandemic preparedness and response;
4. Build a long-term plan for sustainable financing, for global health threat management and response systems cost be shared by all;
5. Empower the WHO to fulfil its mandate as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work, including pandemic preparedness and response.

 

In the current pre-Pandemic Treaty, the WHO is empowered to introduce uniform technical international regulations on the following matters:

1. sanitary and quarantine requirements and other procedures designed to prevent international epidemics;
2. nomenclature with respect to disease, causes of death, and public health practices;
3. standards with respect to diagnostic procedures for international use;
4. standards with respect to safety, purity, and potency of biological, pharmaceutical, and similar products in international commerce; and advertising and labeling of biological, pharmaceutical, and similar products in international commerce. 

 

Responses to WHO Current Guidelines

Of the 50 U.S. states, the following 25 states plus D.C., are either employing the WHO current guidelines or are considering doing so including considering digital vaccine credentials. These are: AK, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, HI, IL, KY, LA, MA, MD, MN, MS, NM, NJ, NY, NV, OK, OR, RI, SC, UT, VA and WA.

South Carolina’s immunization director, Steven White, stated SC is set to issue SMART health cards, even though the state passed legislation barring state entities from developing or issuing vaccine passports. DHEC director White appears to be playing semantics, and instead of calling it a vaccine passport, it is now called a COVID Card, as a ‘convenience’ for those who want to travel. Is this a way to flout the law? Shakespeare said well in Romeo and Juliet “What’s in a name? A rose by any other name would smell as sweet”.

Other countries have varying degrees of restrictions based on vaccine status and/or other COVID19 related state mandates. Israel, Canada and Australia have strict restrictions approaching those of the Chinese Social Credit System mandating compliant behavior to state rules which are intentionally broad to allow them to be changed at will. One’s social credit score utterly controls one’s mobility and entire ability to purchase anything.

 

The WHO is pushing for and has support for a new pandemic treaty. Image Courtesy of The Expose 

 

International Response to Creating a Pandemic Treaty

There have been a variety of responses to the WHO proposal of a Pandemic Treaty. A number from European Union-based or global civil society membership organizations (CSOs). CSOs are usually groups comprised of academics, experts/professionals and/or major funders focused on common identified problems, professional areas, goals, or shared visions. Two CSOs with different responses to the Pandemic Treaty are the Geneva Global Health Hub (G2H2), a European based group; the other is the World Council for Health, a global membership organization, not affiliated with the United Nations. They expressed divergent points of view on a number of items; yet concurred on some they found problematic.

G2H2 seem to have two primary opinions on the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty related publications. One is WHO already has a binding instrument to address health emergencies, the IHR revised in 2005 was basically unapplied during the most difficult phases of CoV19 in 2020. Why a new more aggressive agreement now? Their other concern was that enforceability and accountability wasn’t as stringent as they prefer. Many CSOs located in European Union countries support globalism and the idea of the WHO Pandemic Treaty.

The World Council for Health (WCH) with an expansive, eclectic geographic membership, expressed in a March 3, 2022 letter to the world, copied to the Director-General of the WHO, it is emphatically opposed to the treaty saying it obliterates national sovereignty by giving the WHO of the UN unprecedented, punitive financial and healthcare sanctioning authority to nations it deems noncompliant, enough to functionally destroy countries.

The WCH pointed out historically, the WHO had not served the global community well in its pandemic responses; the current powers of the UN/WHO are oppressive and do not need to be increased; the process underway is not transparent and does not permit the general public any input; it is rife with conflicts of interests; and appears to be a set up to benefit the largest corporate entities which fund the UN/WHO.

They suggest individuals and groups without potential conflicts of interest pursue legal actions to prohibit the Pandemic Treaty, and suggest the following: approach credible government representatives, political parties, trade unions, nonprofits, professional groups, public figures, and independent media to:

1. Raise awareness about the adverse implications of the proposed global pandemic agreement;
2. Call for national campaigns to protect natural law and democratic constitutions;
3. Join credible civil society coalitions such as the World Council for Health.
4. Learn about international principles, accords, conventions, and treaties currently enforce which protect the rights of men, women, and children; like the Siracusa Principles in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which provide legal standards.
5. Learn about the state and national processes to bring injunctions and other prohibitions against such an international treaty agreement from being implemented in your residential and/or business jurisdiction(s); and actively pursue enacting them prior to the 2024 target date for finalizing the Pandemic Treaty.

Don’t think the date won’t be moved up! You don’t have time to wait! It has been moving along. If the WHO perceive push-back forming, they are likely to accelerate their schedule. The influence the WEF within the UN/WHO tends to underscore the likelihood of the process being accelerated.

 

Connections of the WHO with the WEF

Many of the partners of the World Economic Forum (WEF) are corporations engaged with vaccines through financial investment, research and development, production and distribution. Also, major WHO funders are WEF partners, particularly Bill Gates and other nongovernment organizations (NGO’s) of which he is a primary funder. WEF and WHO reciprocally invite their members to present in many of their health related meetings. Many national and provincial/state government executive branches heads, legislators, military and bureaucracy leaders are graduates or currently enrolled in WEF/Klaus Schwab’s Forum of Young Global Leaders. It is advisable to keep in mind that many of these same people have published in print and in video recordings of live events that they are eugenicists and transhumanist/Artificial Intelligence enthusiasts, believe the planet is over-populated and needs significant depopulation for global ecological well-being. 

Eugenics is the practice or advocacy of controlled selective breeding of human populations (as by sterilization, abortion or other means/euthanasia) to improve the population’s genetic composition. Frequently associated with Hitler and Nazism. Eugenics is often associated with evolutionary humanism, Darwinistic atheism.

“The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world” –
Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman, World Economic Forum.

 

What other policy approaches could help prevent future health emergencies effectively?

Advocate stopping bioweaponry expansion; stop mandatory use of Emergency Use Authorization pharmaceuticals per the Nuremburg Code. Advocate and locate district attorneys (DAs) and state Attorneys General (AGs) who will prosecute political and corporate leaders who violate this existing international law. Get honest information from researchers not dependent on federal, NPO or corporate grant funding with conflict of interests or affiliated with patents for treatments or testing. Rescind pharmaceutical corporations’ exemption from being held responsible for harm caused by their consumer products. Legislation putting well-defined limitations in the Insurrection Act regarding its scope and duration which include local and federal accountability. And legislation prohibiting the use of foreign troops, as the UN Peacekeeping in the Kilgali Principles to which the US has signed the agreement during the Obama term. 

 

What ‘We the People’ Can Do

Work with local advocates, political parties and learn who the local, state and national health lobbyists are to influence them. Take classes on Bible-based advocacy strategies and communications to develop a cohort to work with you. These are basic initial steps:

The first step is public awareness; share this information; and prayerfully vet all information. The second is a well-defined, bold personal stance for a Biblical worldview. The third is take community action, at all levels of community, to accomplish and maintain the last step. Lastly, participate in the institutional protection of our rights, our privacy, and autonomy of our body and beliefs as suggested above by the WHC.

Discover and work with organizations willing to put in place permanent limits to the Insurrection Act which has been fluid thus far; make any foreign agreement which diminishes the sovereignty of the U.S. government and its respective states null and void; and make unconstitutional any use of Artificial Intelligence in place of human deliberations for those who form government codes, regulations, judicial deliberations or other policy formation in all branches and levels of government; including AI implants in humans. 

A “Pandemic Treaty” or any international instrument which overrules national or local governments by delivering supranational powers to a few unelected bureaucrats, experts or elites, to exercise at their discretion, on entirely subjective criteria is a global dictatorship of an oligarchy. Those currently pushing for this through the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty, including affiliates of the WEF are avowed eugenicists with a history of economic predatory practices, questionable international health practices and psychological manipulation. To win people to Christ Jesus, individuals need to be alive; and able to exercise their God-given free will to choose; not made into cyborgs or otherwise mentally mutilated by technologies affecting their innate free will capacity. 

“By this you will know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming and which is already in the world at this time. You, little children, are from God and have overcome them, because greater is He who is in you than he who is in the world.” 1John 4:2-4

 

Elected representatives anticipate hearing from concerned citizens. Contact your representatives at:

SC State Representatives 

SC State Senate

US Congress 

US Senate

 

Barbara Bush, M.P.S. was an alcoholic/drug addict until age 34, and after a 5 year cleansing period she earned a master’s degree from Loyola University Graduate Institute for Ministry. Her career has spanned federal, state and local governments, community organizations and ministry working in behavioral health, criminal justice and human services. For the past ten years she has focused on promoting Biblical Truth. She is the principal at Graceful Dynamics Consulting.

Please “like”, comment, share with a friend, and donate to support The Standard on this page.

Donate Any Amount