The most common form of government in world history is power concentrated into the hands of one person, with titles such as King, Khan, Caesar, Kaiser, Czar, Sultan, Maharaja, Emperor, Chairman Mao, Comrade Stalin, or El Presidente. The name changes but the function is the same — one person rule.
At the time of the American Revolution, the King of England was the most powerful king on the planet. The writers of the Constitution had one overriding concern —how to prevent power from reconcentrating.
They designed Constitution to take the concentrated power of a king and separate it into three branches and pit the branches against each other to check power; then separate power Federal and State levels, then tie up this Federal Frankenstein with ten handcuffs–the First Ten Amendments.
In a word, the U.S. Constitution is simply a way to prevent a President from ruling through mandates and executive orders — to prevent one-person rule!
Harry S Truman explained this in his Memoirs-Volume Two: Years of Trial and Hope, that the Constitution intended to prevent “a man on horseback” from seizing power during a national emergency: “The men who wrote the Constitution knew … that tyrannical government had come about where the powers of government were united in the hands of one man. The system they set up was designed to prevent a demagogue or ‘a man on horseback’ from taking over the powers of government…
The most important thought expressed in our Constitution is that the power of government shall always remain limited, through the separation of powers.”
Signer of the Constitution James McHenry noted in his diary (American Historical Review, 1906), that as Ben Franklin left the Constitutional Convention, he was asked by Mrs. Elizabeth Powel of Philadelphia: “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” Franklin replied, “A republic, if you can keep it.”
Webster’s 1828 Dictionary defined “REPUBLIC”: “exercise of the SOVEREIGN POWER is lodged in representatives elected by THE PEOPLE.”
To help explain, the word “democracy” has come to have two definitions: one is a general reference to “popular” government, where people rule themselves; the other is an actual system of government.
As an actual system of government, a democracy is where THE PEOPLE rule directly by being physically present at every meeting.
A republic, on the other hand, is where THE PEOPLE rule indirectly through their representatives.
As a system of government, a DEMOCRACY only successfully worked on a small scale, like Greek city-states that began around 800 BC. City-states were limited in size, as logistically, every citizen had to go to the marketplace everyday to discuss every issue face to face. It was very time consuming.
If a democracy grew larger than where citizens could travel the distance, power subtlety transferred to the busy-body messengers who carried news of the issues back and forth, and they could slant it any way they wanted.
Republics could grow larger, as citizens spent their time taking care of their families and farms, and had representatives in their place go to the market everyday to discuss politics. A “constitutional republic” is where the representatives are limited by a set of rules approved by the citizens.
Kings have “subjects” who are subjected to the king’s will. Democracies and republics have “citizens.”
“Polis” is the Greek word for “city”; and “politics” is simply “the business of the city.” Residents of the city were called “polités”—the Greek word for “citizen,” having responsibility for governing as co-rulers, co-sovereigns, co-kings.
The Latin word “civics” means “relating to a citizen.”
Aristotle wrote in his work Politics (335-323 BC): “Man is a political animal.”
In Israel, every town had a meeting place, an assembly hall for the citizens, called a “synagogue.”
In deep-state forms of government, such as monarchies, power flows TOP-DOWN, from the king down to the lowly subjects.
In democracies and republics, the power flows BOTTOM-UP, from the citizens to their elected public servant representatives.
It is the difference between a dead pyramid, ruled from top-down, and a living tree, where every root, even the tiniest, must participate from the bottom-up to keep the tree alive — every citizen must be involved.
Citizens are in charge of their own lives, and together, are in charge of the whole country.
Those with agendas, though, still try to push their will, so methods of manipulation developed.
In popular governments, having recognition and praise from other citizens is continually sought for as the greatest honor; and having other citizens ridicule or ostracized you is the greatest shame to be avoided at all costs.
Ostracizing is where 6,000 citizens of Athens could vote to have you banished out of town for ten years. Today, citizens want to be liked, friended, and followed; and being unfriended, blocked, or banned is to be avoided at all costs. Ostracizing has taken the form of being locked out of your account or being de-platformed.
Greek theater was not so much for entertainment as a method used by government leaders to push political agendas. In Greek tragedies, comedies, and satires, those who conformed to political agendas were honored, and those who did not conform were publicly ridiculed, mocked, and shamed.
Democracies are susceptible to being whipped into a frenzy, where in rare cases a majority could carry out sudden mob justice. Constitutional republics are slower to change, especially with the recognition of Creator-given rights which the government is guaranteed to protect.
America’s founders designed a government that was intentionally slow to change—frustratingly slow at times in making good changes, but thankfully slow in making irreversible bad changes. The founders realized it could take a lifetime to build a mansion and one irresponsible match to burn it down in a day.
America’s republic is unique in that it has grown to have the most citizens of any republic in world history, as Theodore Roosevelt stated October 24, 1903:
“In no other place and at no other time has the experiment of government of the people, by the people, for the people, been tried on so vast a scale as here in our own country.”
Yale President Ezra Stiles stated in 1788:
“Most states of all ages… have been founded in rapacity, usurpation and injustice… All the forms of CIVIL POLITY (government systems) have been tried by mankind, EXCEPT ONE: and that seems to have been reserved in Providence to be realized in America.”
Americans pledge allegiance to the Flag “and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands.” Citizens are basically pledging allegiance to being in charge of themselves, exercising their authority through representatives they pick.
When someone protests the flag, what they are effectively saying is, “I no longer want to be king … I protest this system where the people rule themselves.”
A republic only lasts as long as the citizens have morals, virtue, and self-control.
John Adams warned October 11, 1798:
“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other …”
He added:
“We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge … would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net.”
In the Roman Republic, “representatives” were hereditary positions. The American Republic is a hybrid, where our representatives are democratically elected.
John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, stated September 8, 1777:
“The Americans are the first people whom Heaven has favored with an opportunity of deliberating upon, and choosing the forms of government under which they should live. All other constitutions have derived their existence from violence or accidental circumstances.”
Ronald Reagan stated in 1961:
“In this country of ours took place the greatest revolution that has ever taken place in the world’s history. Every other revolution simply exchanged one set of rulers for another.”
Declaration signer James Wilson, who also signed the Constitution and was appointed to the Supreme Court by George Washington, remarked at Pennsylvania’s ratifying convention, November 26, 1787: “Governments, in general, have been the result of force, of fraud, and accident. After a period of 6,000 years has elapsed since the creation, the United States exhibit to the world the first instance … of a nation… assembling voluntarily… and deciding calmly concerning that system of government under which they would wish that they and their posterity should live.”
John Adams wrote in his notes on Canon & Feudal Law, 1765:
“I always consider the settlement of America with reverence … as the opening of a grand scene and design in Providence for the illumination of the ignorant, and the emancipation of the slavish part of mankind all over the earth.”
In 1802, Daniel Webster stated in a Fourth of July Oration:
“The history of the world is before us … The civil, the social, the Christian virtues are requisite to render us worthy the continuation of that government which is the freest on earth.”
The last line of the Constitution was:
“Done … the SEVENTEENTH DAY of SEPTEMBER, in the year of our LORD one thousand seven hundred and eighty seven.”
After the U.S. Constitution was written, it needed to be ratified by nine states in order to go into effect.
Eight states had ratified it, and New Hampshire was in line to be the ninth, but disagreements caused it to stall.
The Governor of New Hampshire set the date to observe the annual Day of Fasting.
New Hampshire reconvened its ratifying convention in June of 1788.
Harvard President Rev. Samuel Langdon gave an address which was instrumental in convincing the delegates to ratify the Constitution.
The Portsmouth Daily Evening Times, January 1, 1891, acknowledged Rev. Samuel Langdon’s influence:
“… by his voice and example he contributed more perhaps, than any other man to the favorable action of that body.”
Langdon’s address was titled “The REPUBLIC of the ISRAELITES an example to the AMERICAN STATES,” June 5, 1788.
In it, he stated:
“Instead of the twelve tribes of Israel, we may substitute the thirteen states of the American union, and see this application plainly … That as God in the course of his kind providence hath given you an excellent Constitution of government, founded on the most rational, equitable, and liberal principles, by which all that liberty is secured … and you are impowered to make righteous laws for promoting public order and good morals; and as he has moreover given you by his Son Jesus Christ … a complete revelation of his will … it will be your wisdom … to … adhere faithfully to the doctrines and commands of the gospel, and practice every public and private virtue.”
Langdon continued:
“The Israelites may be considered as a pattern to the world in all ages… Government… on republican principles, required laws; without which it must have degenerated immediately into… absolute monarchy… How unexampled was this quick progress of the Israelites, from abject slavery, ignorance, and almost total want of order, to a national establishment perfected in all its parts far beyond all other kingdoms and states! From a mere mob, to a well regulated nation, under a government and laws far superior to what any other nation could boast! …”
Langdon concluded:
“It was a long time after the law of Moses was given before the rest of the world knew any thing of government by law…
It was six hundred years after Moses before… Grecian republics received a very imperfect… code of laws from Lycurgus. It was about five hundred years from the first founding of the celebrated Roman empire… before the first laws of that empire.”
After Langdon’s address, New Hampshire’s delegates voted to ratify the U.S. Constitution, thus putting it into effect.
Professors Donald S. Lutz and Charles S. Hyneman published an article in American Political Science Review, 1984, titled “The Relative Influence of European Writers on Late 18th-Century American Political Thought.”
They examined nearly 15,000 writings of the 55 writers of the U.S. Constitution, including newspaper articles, pamphlets, books and monographs, and discovered that the Bible, especially the book of Deuteronomy, contributed 34 percent of all direct quotes made by the Founders. When indirect Bible citations were included, the percentage rose even higher.
Benjamin Franklin wrote to the editor of the Federal Gazette, April 8, 1788 (The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787; Farrand’s Records, Vol. 3, CXCV, pp. 296-297; Documentary History of the Constitution, IV, 567-571):
“”To conclude, I beg I may not be understood to infer, that our general Convention was divinely inspired when it form’d the new federal Constitution, merely because that Constitution has been unreasonably and vehemently opposed;
… yet I must own I have so much faith in the general government of the World by Providence, that I can hardly conceive a transaction of such momentous importance to the Welfare of Millions now existing, and to exist in the Posterity of a great Nation, should be suffered to pass without being in some degree influenc’d, guided and governed by that omnipotent, omnipresent beneficent Ruler, in whom all inferior spirits live and move and have their being.”
Franklin’s reference was to what the Apostle Paul said in the Book of Acts 17:28 “In Him we live and move and have our being.”
Alexander Hamilton wrote of the Constitution in his Letters of Caesar, 1787:
“Whether the New Constitution, if adopted, will prove adequate to such desirable ends, time, the mother of events, will show. For my own part, I sincerely esteem it a system, which, without the finger of God, never could have been suggested and agreed upon by such a diversity of interests.” (Paul L. Ford, Essays on the Constitution of the United States, Historical Printing Club, Brooklyn, 1892, pg 245).
George Washington opened the Constitutional Convention, stating:
“Let us raise a standard to which the wise and the honest can repair. The event is in the hand of God.”
Ten days after his Inauguration, President Washington wrote to the United Baptist Churches of Virginia, May 10, 1789:
“If I could have entertained the slightest apprehension that the Constitution framed by the Convention, where I had the honor to preside, might possibly endanger the religious rights of any ecclesiastical Society, certainly I would never have placed my signature to it.”
President Washington, the same week Congress passed the Bill of Rights, declared, October 3, 1789:
“Whereas both Houses of Congress have by their joint Committee requested me ‘to recommend… a Day of Public Thanksgiving and Prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God,
especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness’… I do recommend… the 26th day of November… to be devoted by the People of these United States to the service of that great and glorious Being, who is the beneficent Author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be…”‘
Washington continued:
“That we may then all unite in rendering unto Him our sincere and humble thanks… for the peaceable and rational manner in which we have been enabled to establish constitutions of government for our safety and happiness,
and particularly the national one now lately instituted, for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed.”
Poet Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote: “America is another name for opportunity. Our whole history appears like a last effort of Divine Providence in behalf of the human race.”
G.K. Chersterton wrote in “What is America” (What I Saw In America, 1922): “America is the only nation in the world that is founded on creed. That creed is set forth… in the Declaration of Independence… that all men are equal in their claim to justice, that governments exist to give them that justice… The Declaration… certainly does condemn… atheism, since it clearly names the Creator as the ultimate authority from whom these equal rights are derived.”
James Madison wrote to Jefferson, October 24, 1787, that writing the Constitution: “… formed a task more difficult than can be well conceived… Adding to these considerations the natural diversity of human opinions on all new and complicated subjects, it is impossible to consider the degree of concord which ultimately prevailed as less than a miracle.”
George Washington wrote to Marquis de Lafayette, February 7, 1788: “As to… the new Constitution… it appears to me, then, little short of a miracle, that the delegates from so many different states… should unite in forming a system of national Government.”
Washington wrote in the original draft of his Inaugural Address, 1789:
“Should… those incited by the lust of power… over leap the known barriers of this Constitution and violate the unalienable rights of humanity: it will only serve to show, that no compact among men (however provident in its construction and sacred in its ratification) can be pronounced everlasting and inviolable (impenetrable) … no wall of words… no mound of parchment can be so formed as to stand against the sweeping torrent of boundless ambition on the side, aided by the sapping current of corrupted morals on the other.”
Daniel Webster stated:
“Miracles do not cluster. That which has happened but once in six thousand years, cannot be expected to happen often… Hold on, my friends, to the Constitution of your country and the government established under it… Such a government, once destroyed, would have a void to be filled, perhaps for centuries, with evolution and tumult, riot and despotism.”
James Madison wrote in Sept of 1829 (Writings 9:351–57): “The happy Union of these states is a wonder; their Constitution—a miracle; their example the hope of liberty throughout the world. Woe to the ambition that would meditate the destruction of either!”
President William Henry Harrison warned in his Inaugural Address, March 4, 1841:
“As long as the love of power is a dominant passion of the human bosom… so long will the liberties of a people depend on their constant attention to its preservation. The danger to all well-established free governments arises from the unwillingness of the people to believe in… the influence of designing men…
This is the old trick of those who would usurp the government of their country. In the name of democracy they speak, warning the people against the influence of wealth and the danger of aristocracy…
There is at times much difficulty in distinguishing the false from the true spirit …
The true spirit of liberty … is mild … whilst the spirit of party, assuming to be that of liberty, is harsh, vindictive, and intolerant, and totally reckless as to the character of the allies which it brings to the aid of its cause …
The reign of an intolerant spirit of party amongst a free people seldom fails to result in a dangerous accession to the Executive power introduced and established amidst unusual professions of devotion to democracy.”
U.S. Senator Henry Cabot Lodge stated in 1919:
“The United States is THE WORLD’S BEST HOPE …
Beware how you trifle with your marvelous inheritance … for if we stumble & fall, freedom and civilization everywhere will go down in ruin.”
William Federer is a nationally known speaker, best-selling author, and president of Amerisearch, Inc., a publishing company dedicated to researching America’s noble heritage. Bill’s AMERICAN MINUTE radio feature is broadcast daily across America and by the Internet. His Faith in History television airs on the TCT Network on stations across America and via DirectTV.
Please “like”, comment, share with a friend, and donate to support The Standard on this page.
RSS - Posts